Open Access – YES please!

Prior to my previous post, I felt that the topic discussed is relatively wide and there would be different views from different people. I was right! Look at what I’ve learned today:

Ebrahim mentioned coursera, an online learning platform. Honestly, I was drawn to his post title “I got my degree for $0”. I couldn’t believe that this was true till I read this post. It seems like this is a rising trend – attending classes online, and now, you can even get a “degree”! I believe this would be able to help many students who cannot afford the huge sum needed for education. He also said:

I guess being an optimist I believe everyone should benefit from education regardless of your financial status, and the internet has given us the ability to do so if we let it!

Charmaine shared the alternative concept of Creative Commons. Which means the works are protected under the “some rights reserved” policy instead of “all rights reserved” policy. Interested users can therefore use the producers’ materials under their conditions. I think this is a really interesting and effective concept, which brings benefits to both parties.

It is beneficial for the users as they get to use the materials for free. As for the producers of the materials, they could be made known to the public and gain more recognition as their materials are spread.

Amanda brought up the issue of plagiarism if we allow content to be freely available. I agree that it will cause a problem and people may take the content of others and pass it off as their own material Hence, I felt that the Creative Commons policy may be able to help this problem.

 

So after some thought, I feel that having an open access would be beneficial for both parties as the advantages outweigh the disadvantages.

(302 words)

Commented on: Charmaine & Amanda‘s blog post.

Making materials freely available online?

photo credit: opensourceway via photopin cc

Being a student, the #1 assignment we have is to do research. This is needed to have a deeper understanding of what the topic is about. Moreover, there’s so much in the Internet, our lecturers and learning materials can never cover as much. Just look at how much data is generated in ONE minute! 

However, from my experience, it seems like e-books, research journals and papers are often behind paywalls. Based on a survey done by a global pricing consultancy, Simon-Kucher & Partners, 90% of online content will be held behind the paywalls in the upcoming 3 years. (Lepitak, S., 2013)

From a student’s point-of-view, this isn’t good news! Why do we need to pay for online materials?

Educational perspective:

With open access, more information can be gathered and allow students to learn more at anytime with no extra cost. I can’t imagine if every site I go for information started charging us!  If I have to do pay, I’d rather go to the library to obtain information. I’m sure some of you have experienced the pain of only being able to read abstracts, with the key points all being paid content. What if you paid for it and realized it isn’t something you are looking for?

As for the authors of these materials, information would be readily available and they would be able to exchange ideas and improve on their work, bringing more and better materials to the everyone! It could also increase the awareness and profile of the author, providing them with greater credibility in their work.

It can also help provide researches and authors in developing countries with the opportunity to participate in establishing journals, reports, etc.!

However, this could negatively impact the quality and accuracy of materials. If materials become open content, it means that they will not go through reviews and it therefore means that there is no quality control.

Media perspective:

Open content could help to better spread the artistes’ capabilities internationally and also gain revenue through other sources such as advertisements.

However, when Apple and U2 partnered to give out their free album, it turned into an unexpected disaster. Many were unhappy with this as they took it as an insult to the industry.

Critics also asked whether this was the same U2 whose long-term manager Paul McGuinness opined five years ago: “We are living in an era when ‘free’ is decimating the music industry and is starting to do the same to film, TV and books. What has gone so wrong?”

(408 words)

 

References:

Lepitak, S. (2013), 90% of online content to be held behind paywalls in three years media company survey suggests | The Drum. Available at: http://www.thedrum.com/news/2013/04/12/90-online-content-be-held-behind-paywalls-three-years-media-company-survey-suggests [Accessed December 9, 2014].

Advantages and Disadvantages of Open Access | edanz editing global. Available at: http://www.edanzediting.com/blog/advantages_and_disadvantages_open_access#.VIcCZFOUf1t [Accessed December 9, 2014].

Sherwin, A. (2014), Free U2 album: How the most generous giveaway in music history turned PR disaster – Features – Music – The Independent. Available at: http://www.independent.co.uk/arts-entertainment/music/features/free-u2-album-how-the-most-generous-giveaway-in-music-history-turned-into-a-pr-disaster-9745028.html [Accessed December 9, 2014].

Tepper, A. (2012), How Much Data Is Created Every Minute? [INFOGRAPHIC]. Available at: http://mashable.com/2012/06/22/data-created-every-minute/ [Accessed December 9, 2014].

Open Access: Not just a matter for scientists | Open Access Working Group. Available at: http://access.okfn.org/2012/05/17/open-access-not-just-a-matter-for-scientists/ [Accessed December 9, 2014].